Sapp-USHelicopters 2007

Page 1

U.S.Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration MAY 1 7 2.007 Joe M. Sapp Director of Operations u.s. Helicopters, Inc.

Highway 74 West Post Office Box 625 Marshville, NC 281 03

Dear Mr. Sapp:

By letter dated September 27,2006, to Donald E. Gardner, Manager, Flight Standards District Office 33, you asked for a legal interpretation about whether U. S. Helicopters could conduct electronic news gathering (ENG) flights under Part 91, instead of Part 135, pursuant to the exception for Aerial Work Operations, "Aerial Photography" contained in 14 CFR §119.1(e)«4)(iii) of the Federal Aviation Regulations.

u.s. Helicopter statement of facts.

U. S. Helicopters has exclusive-use contracts with television stations throughout the United States for the purpose of ENG media photography and reporting with helicopters, during both day and night visual flight conditions. U.S. Helicopters maintains that that all persons on board are flight crewmembers or crewmembers as defined by 14 CFR Part 1, and are employed by U.S. Helicopters or the respective television stations. They also state that the aircraft are not available, or used, for charter flights involving transportation in common carriage of passengers or cargo .. Finally, they state that the ENG equipment is permanently installed on the aircraft.

14 CFR 119.1 Applicability.

(e) Except for operations when common carriage is not involved conducted with airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of 20 seats or more, excluding any required crewmember seat, or a payload capacity of 6,000 pounds or more, this part does not apply to- ~----- --- -(4} Aerial-work-Oper-ations,-including-- - - -- -~------ (i) Crop dusting, seeding, spraying, and bird chasing;

(ii) Banner towing;

(iii) Aerial photography or survey;

Page 2

(iv) Firefighting;

(v) Helicopter operations in construction or repair work (but it does apply to transportation to and from the site of operations); and (vi) Powerline or pipeline patrol;

[Docket No. 28154, 60 FR 65913, 'Dec. 20, 1995, as amended by Arndt. 119-4,66 FR 23557, May 9,2001; Arndt. 119-5,67 FR 9554, Mar. 1,2002; Arndt. 119-7,68 FR 54584, Sept. 17,2003] The FAA Interpretations Under old section 135. 1(b)(4)(iii) of the Federal Aviation Regulations, a company may supply its aircraft and pilot to a TV station for aerial photography without holding an air carrier certificate. FAA letter to R.H. Tyler, dated August 5, 1975. (Copy enclosed.) The examples of aerial work cited in the regulation, (at that time section 135.1(b)(4», are not exclusive and other aerial work operations not listed may be included in the provision. FAA Letter to Butler, Hickey & Long, dated June 26, 1989. (Copy enclosed.) In a 1989 interpretation, the FAA discussed the meaning of "aerial photography" in the context of flights transporting movie crews scouting locations. The FAA noted that the phrase was not defined in the regulations and construed it to mean, or reflect, the common import of the language. The FAA opined that the expression "aerial photography" connotes a condition where taking pictures or filming is done from the air. The second issue was that if the operation also included carrying passengers from one point to another (a dual purpose), the operation would have to be conducted under Part 135, not Part 91. FAA letter to Gerald Naeke1 dated April 7, 1989. (Copy enclosed.)

Conclusion.

ENG media photography and reporting flights may be conducted under Part 91 pursuant to the aerial work operations, aerial photography, exception in part 119.1(e)(4)(iii) provided each person on board, in addition to the flight crewmembers, is necessary to perform the aerial work operation. Other regulations may impose additional limits. If the flight' operation becomes "dual-purpose" (e.g .. the flight lands at point B) then the aerial works exception does not apply.

--- -- --~-- --- - --- --- ------------- ---- ----------------_. __ .._----~--~----_ •.._-_.----_ ..-

Page 3

This response has been prepared by Cecile O'Connor, Attorney in the Regulations Division of the Office of the Chief Counsel and has been coordinated with the Air Transportation Division of Flight Standards Service. If you have additional questions regarding this matter, please contact us at your earliest convenience at (202) 267-3073.

Sincerely,

~f/-~~- Rebecca B. MacPherson Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations Enclosures ~- - --- ---------~- ----------- -------------- -

Page 4

.. would b• c:ooaiderecl the operator of the alrcra..ft carrying pa•••llgen for compenaatloD. A Part 135 Commerc:la.l Operator Certif!cate ·would be the miaimmn certificate required. Should I $S ·{ eater into lea••• Wltb aulflclent nwnbera of peraons (natural and lntaDSlble) to constitute commQn carriage, an /dr Taxi Certificate would be required. For you.r imormatloia •am• ca••• bea riu!r--oily the•• qaeat:lon• are u. s. v. Harry E. Bradley, et al, Z52 F. Supp. 804; B &Dd M Lea•lns CorporaUoa, et al v. U. s., 331 F. Zd 59Z: Kyle K. Veaa · and Dr. David A. McCoy, d/b/a. .•.eronaut Alr Service v. David M. Cardner "'• McCoy Fly1Dg Service, Inc. 11Avi. _17, 114 and 17,31Z; Admiainratol' v. Paul .Fred Roae, 29CAB1523; ~ "'• William M. Muna, 352 F.Zd 196: Laa Vega• Hacienda,. Inc. et al v. CAB,. 298 F. 2d 430: Adrninlatrator v. Golden Easle Aviation, Inc. N. T, s. B. Do:ket SE-1395.

Your aec:ond queatlon le aa followar .

2. Under Part 135, appllcablllty, lt lndudea aerial photo1raphy aa belng covered by that part. A local televlaion atatlon has - aaked lf·they could hlre the company plane and pilot fol" thepurpo•• ol photograpblna dlaaatera, etc. Would ttda operation be a violation of Part 135?

SectloD. 135. l(b) of the Federal AviatloD R!taulationa apedflcally exempts aerial photography from the requirements of Part 135. therefore, 1upplyta1 th• aircrat't,and .pilot to the TV atation for auch purpose would no' require . . to hold a Part 135 certificate.

For your con•lderatl~n, I refer yoa to Subpart D of Part 91 of the replatlou begimdng with Section 91.181. The Mluubi•hl MU-Z la a turbojet powered multl•enpn• aircraft which may be operated under that Subpart. You may wtah to conalder a time aha~ng agreement a• de&Md In Section 91.18l(c). You •bould carefully •tudy all of Subpart _ D to aa811re compliance with lnapecdoo and ma.ln.teaauce as well aa ----------·----cperatlonal-~quirement._.Dd-lol! tnf'onnatioruu-to-W:bat..chaz-1118-*-•----- may make for the u•e of its aircr&ft and. pilot. Ple1tae rei:ar also to S ection 91. 54 bow:i tl.S th~ truth in la.asillg r3gulatlon. H applie> !o i:b.s ?-AU-2.

. ....

ooo?s :7

Page 5

!35"·/ '.

I Ii I iIi II - I ".

IlI III i l Ou. Ci••• nl .AnatloD Dletric:t Offic:e at Wiley Poet Airport. Bethany. Oklahoma win be pleaeed to aid you In this matter. R. H. TYJ..ER AetiDl R.poa.al COUIl •• l , I I1._~m __ ~_ ..•• ~- ~=--= __n-_· , I ---~---- .

00077 " : 8 « I .. ...."" ..... , ...........

Page 6

'! ,.

T.

i f J r • i r~ f · . . . : . - ~ . ,.. - -:--: .- _ .,..._ ·-. --- . ~· '"..., o -~:~:;~}:~c:::~~: f0~; ,~.J ~1A.-r~ 1~..: ~ ): _ .,.• . - · • - • "lf l!1!"' . -··- - ~ -:<_-· - . - J .. - ._;. ..,. _, . -·.=>: i;::.\~V' !O l ..:Jt ; f•Ocrol A"iohon ~trarion . · •·•'ilffr • • • • • :·· .a .

[i:·r.:::>-~~G/i :~l~~::·~~ - ,.~Q ~ • _-4 , • ..

.. J • -: · . .. .

.

:· ~. i ! r. l :;; t: l , r.~q • ;..., , 1 'E'!. i,; ~•; 'f " L.onl) A t:~rn~r~ ~t L~w :·. u. 9=.x ~&9 ':. . • " .:.-r .,. ~ . . ..... 7~33!, . ,, .

. ,.

~ . ': . ". : . }._:~:~ ...-.. .. . .. . .

Re: Mid-South Helicopters.

·- . . . . . .! . . -~-- · -.. ---~ .

Dear Mr. Hicky: · . j~- - , ·~ ·- -- ·~-.-... ...... .

T,,.;. .~ i::: ~r. rcapl.}11.se t.~ yot:r 1E:tte1 wf Jane. s, l9i9; ·addr·e~ --- r. :. t1.~ ;..; ti119 A'1.i.iniztrator, wh~re1n yo~ 1eqat!6t o&.:it opinio:1 T:

,_.., ... : . ~trii:-c a ;yp~ of hc:licopt~1 ~pe1at.ion vhich )OUX ch.:r1t, Mid-South Helicopters ( ''.Mid-South" ) . ftopoaea t.C p1ovide s....

:.=.>:r i:. u~ .. ~., crrrvr ·eeit;~i:~ aq·'1n~Jc$ in tiift St.ate, of Arll.&nsa~, 1~1 is "' i thj~ the p~rvif:w of Pc.rt lJS c.t cbe F~o~r•l Av.iatHi:?

!~ J~ l~ti~ns (FAR}. ~e bev~ be~n &sk~d to reply.

~it:- .::i~~z::; t a1.d Lhac Mid-South Helicopters do•:; not hold an ;, ~ :

...:.;;rr ... .,.r ''l•c.:Hat.i.n; ct?rtiticate issuea uucl.er PAit lJ~ of tht:

f.i.:... 'it.o?o ·compar.y de:sir•.s to· t.id en a eontracl . off•r ·e~ oy t: ~ - · · ~t.:: r. ~ ;;.i .~rkan:>as 1.0 · F•rov1dA af:r 1al ~urv~i l l~nc• to at•t• .,..~ lo~~J ~!."" .. n(Qtc.:·.:r:Ant &g•nci•a as p'-lrt of a mart]Ui1na cI~ ·.H . ·•t'.0:1 ,t:itu~ra:::. The pris:.ary tunctiCJn 0£ Mi d-South . w.:.·-.:~:1 toe :.,.·, ! l y ~. ,ihii•t!; ot law •nfor<"e~&n~ A~'-nci•• over desigr..:.t ... ~ ~:~•~ j~ ~~•:ch oi growing ~~rtju~na pJ~nt~.

~c•.er~Uy, Part l35 appllea co:.

........~ ..,. .....

····~ -...--- --·i l le X-1- "Pf:-J-&.:..i.OIULUMc.L.iaJ.l..bArJ..t l .C Cf It 29 ~ :--~'-=~-=:..=..-=~.!_ ,~~1--~~- ....

o. carr1a.ge of u1J: · -.

·.

c. CArriagc in a1r · co1U11~rc~<>i pcr•oha ·or property for c •.:n~pen•;st ion or hir~ as a co1rdll~tcU1l o~rator (no~ an air ~arri~rJ in 6iicr•ft having a r~xir.um •a•ting capacity of leas ,t.an t~wnty (20) paa~~nger& or a ~•xi~um paylo&d capacjty of J~5a LhAn 6,~oo p~und~: ~r

Page 7

. 2 ~ ..f.,t,.~:..

d. Carr .i ~9e ot pt; rsons ot prop~r t~ in air commerce (solel~ ·~ ·. .i r:tr<Jstote) ir. commQn carriage in aircraft having a 111aximui;t . : :.:z.ting capiacity of t.t'1irty (JO) aeu~s or less .or a NXimum -~:~-;;,.~ · p~yload c~pacity of 7,500 pounds or less. ~ · ;]:hou g h the above designa~ions serve to ~stabliah Which Lf'ctlator .s Ir...iSt. obt'1in a certificate issued under Part 135 of tt..; F~.R, such operators are now termed •air carri•ra• and the ·:.:.r.i::.ei:·: th!'ead uni1:in9 them under part 135 is the transportation J ! . ~i~ co;rJr.~tce of persons . or prop.::rly for compensation or :-,; re . ~=.t:e Special .Federal >.viation Regul&tions (SJ.'AR) 3&-2, as ~! , _;_. ,, ,.o;c:-ci, SFJJ< 3&-4, 52 PR 28939 {Aug. 4, 1987) Primarily, the d i £t1~ cticns now serve tn determine what operations s y~~if 1c~t i ~ns are needed under Part 135 or 121 of the FAR. ~';;· ~ r:. t i c..c. s in·Jol vi n9 the c·arr iag~ of i;>erscr.s or propert.y tor .:-r, ::. r·,;.f,.;.2tion t.:1r hire and excluded fro1n Part 13~ of th@ FAR ar~ { .:, ur . ~ in Section 135.l(b). •Aeri&l work operations• are .. ~"'r·.:.. ,~ cH 135.l(b)(4). While certain examples of excluded - ··· ~ - ·- .. :.:rk oper.:at1ons &re cited, we vie:w these as not being exclusive ana certainly other aetial work operations not listea ~&y f~ll within l3S.l(b)(4).

~~rial inspectjcns of fields for ~n~ purpose of locating ·r;: ~: i Jt.:;ini2 wo11Jd apr-~ar to r>e cost closel)' related to either ·.2~r i.!l survi:y• or •power line OI pip.:line partrol or · other typ0s ot patrol ~pproved by the Aduinisttator• whic~ are excl~dcd at 135.l(o)l~)(iii) and (vi) respecti~ely. ~herefore, i~~oiar as the op&ra~1on contempl4t&c oy ~id-Soutn involves the c ~rricge of law enforcement personnel fot the ~urpose of ~p0Lting · ro~rijuana, that aspect of th~ ac~ivi;y may be excluded f.rom Part 135. · · E~w ~ v~r, w~ find it difficult to ~nvi~ion the proposed op~raLi~n not including ·tli9hts the primary purpose of which w.-.~ ld t,~ to tr &nsport personnel. Wh~re th~_ pur.p.os.JL.Qf A f l.ight. wt?_::i ld be to transp_ort an individ~u&l . t~ · ;. meet~_ng_ plc.ce to ... coordird·t~ a search with oth·ers: or to._llncr::rn a field to ..~lit'2ir. s~n1ples; o"r to land- ·in or"dar.. that the o·fffcer- iboard ·- ·------G~l..d.:_p..:..r.f.o..IJl.1 an i-nvestigat~~y__f u .~ct ion, then tJ~n-~_po. r.tt.t.i.9n, rat h_~J_l.biao~ _.Su.rve1 l J,ance .b.!S.C?..mes f he pl i~~pu-~pos-e-::o_(_ .th~----- £ l i.9ht. Such .-Activities do fill ·with.in.the ambit of .·part l3S o'na are·· not excluded und~r 13S.l(b)(4). Sueb act.ivitiea ::e· ' r.:quirc: anair ear rier o~rating cert if ieate and appropriate \ ·· ep*r~tions specifications. · · · · .·~

Page 8

It 1s no~ possible from your letter alone to determine ~l.~ f-copos~d op~ration requires certification or not. sU9ge~t that you ana your client may wish to meet with r.:-?ri:~h~ntat:ivas of the FAA at' the Little Rock, Arkansas, Fliqht St~~oalds Oistrlct Office to go over in d~tail all aspects ot t~~ Opefbtior. so thaL a linal decision can be made • .:::;1r. C· c;I ~ 1y , ~~~s v. HE7~lNC~R t.-C j C f.:. Arloe: t sc,n !~"'t("(f1c;.y •..

~----- .. ---- ~~---~- ------_._--------~-------~--------~-------~- _.~----------- .-

Page 9

• I \ c !Ir. Gerald Naekel ~ ~ 12939 '· / '- fl . 'l. '

Dear Mr. Naekel: · ~· · '· ' { / ...J 1 ' :----·· f.' C.,.,_, This is in response to your letter of October 24, 1988, .wherein / you requested an interpretation of PAR 135.l(b)(f)(iii), applicability of Part 135, to flights surveying for wild-life or for forest service data. Your bypotheticel question is set forth below and is followed by our interpretation of the r99ulation •• it · •pplies to ••ch of your questions. •stEtWUO - Suryeying 135. lCb> <•> Ciiil: Assume we have an PAR 135 Air Carrier certif icete and operate several helicopters. our operations ire about 98\ FAR 91 flights for the company or operations under PA.Rs 133 and 137. The FAR 135 certificate is require~ for ua because of Porest Service contracts.

One of our contract missions is to conduct aerial survey for wild-life, or for forest survey d•ta. Generally the contractor--who is usually • 9overnment entity such as the Forest Service or State Forestry or Piah and Game Department--will send alon9 men to do the counting or marking of trees. Sometimes we are directed to lend so the surveyors may 9et out and look over the trees or investigate animal habitats. Sometimes we abut-down the helicopters; aometi-.s we do not. Often when we le•ve we have only a general idea of where ·we are going and from that point on the surveyors direct us dependin9 on what they are finding. · Often times at the end of the survey we will drop the surveyors off at a aite other than where we departed from. Sometimes the Forest Service requires us to hover over tall · trees 1s they mark the upper branches. This could not be done under PAR 135. Is all of this PAR 91?• Your Question •Tb• questions then ask if all of this is conducted.under PAR tl •• a commercial operation not requiring the PAR 135 rulea7• (sic>.

Page 10

Answer The answer will depend upon whether the purpose of the flights is for the carriage of passengers or for aerial surveying or both. If the sole purpose is for aerial surveying, then the operation may be conducted pursuant to Part 91. However, if -the operation includes carrying passengers from one point to another in addition to the aerial surveying (i.e., dual purpose) then the operation mu·st be conducted in accordance with Part 135.

Your question concerns a Part 135 applicability ezception which reads as follows:

(b) This part does not apply to- ••• (4) Aerial work operations, including(iii) Aerial photography or survey. ...

Section (b) of FAR 135~1 enunciates ezceptions to the general rule of applicability including the aerial surveying ezception. This ezception, like all ezceptions, operates to restrict the applicability of the general rule. The specific language ezcludes aerial surveying from Part 135 coverage. Thus, if the particular flight is for aerial survey, that operation is not subject to Part 135 rules.

Practically, your letter inquires into the meaning of the phrase •aerial •.. survey.• In construing the Pederal Aviation Regulations, no magical formula or semantic insight is needed. Where a regulation does not define a word or phrase, it must be construed to reflect the coltlllOn import of its language . The words should be t~ken to mean nothing more than a dictionary definition, which reports coltlllOn usage. Clearly, the ezpression, •aerial ••• survey,• connotes a condition where something is ezamined or reviewed from the air.

Consistent with the above concept, the Agency interprets this regulation in a manner that if a helicopter lands at a location oth•r than the point of origin, the surveying ezception does not apply. This is due to the fact the flight takes on a •dual purpose• of both surveying and transporting passengers from . one point to another for compensation or hire . However, if the helicopter returns to the point of departure witbo~t landing at another location, then tbe surveying ezception would apply. Thus, if an operator takes . off on a surveying flight under the rules of Part 91 that person must be deemed to recognize that no landing other than at the origin point is permitted and should •o inform his passengers befor~ ta~ing off. If the · ----.---- ~anriCJeTs-tnl!lcate~-.at · tlle:r migtirHX for a landing, then flie---·-- rules of Part 135 should be followed. If they do not •o indicate and later chan;e their minds, a prudent operator should decline the request on tbe grounds that he/she could be subjected to an PAA enforcement action. Indeed, a prudent operator should inquire before the flight to determine what is

Page 11

\.

contemplated by the passengers. Having so inquired, the operator can determine what rules apply. The determining factor is whether the helicopter lands at a location other than the point of origin since the landing changes the nature of the operation from an aerial survey operation to a dual purpose operation of both aerial survey and carriage of passengers and/or property. Each flight is considered separately.

In your letter you make the statement:

·Sometimes the Forest Service requires us to bover over tall trees as they mark the upper branches.- There is not enough information in this statement to provide you an answer. For ezample, how do the forest service personnel mark the trees? Do they spray or drop something from the helicopter or do they hang in some sort of sling and mark the trees? How is the helicopter certificated? We will need a complete factual description of what occurs in such an operation in addition to answers to these specific questions.

Sincerely,

••..•....•."~ ~ It 1ft.

John H. tassa Assistant Chief Counsel