Skip to Main Content
FlightPushFLIGHTPUSH
NTSB Safety Recommendations

Learn

Dashboard My Courses Mastery Map Practice Flight Bag

Resources

CFR & AIM FAA Orders Handbooks & Guides Certification Standards Pilot/Controller Glossary Advisory Circulars Legal Interpretations
Safety Center
Articles Trust Center
Help Center FAQ Status
  1. Safety Center
  2. NTSB Safety Recommendations
  3. NTSB A-88-124
Loading
flightpush.co home

NTSB · Safety Recommendation

Safety Recommendation A-88-124

Recommendation

THE NTSB RECOMMENDS THAT THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: EVALUATE PROHIBITING THE TRANSPORTATION OF OXIDIZERS IN CARGO COMPARTMENTS THAT DO NOT HAVE FIRE/SMOKE DETECTION AND FIRE EXTINGUISHMENT SYSTEMS, AND DETERMINE IF OTHER CLASSES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ALSO SHOULD BE EXCLUDED FROM CARGO COMPARTMENTS WITHOUT THESE SAFETY SYSTEMS.

Safety Issue and Context

ON FEBRUARY 3, 1988, AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHT 132, A MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC-9-83, DEPARTED DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, TEXAS, FOR NASHVILLE METROPOLITAN AIRPORT, TENNESSEE. IN ADDITION TO THE PASSENGER LUGGAGE IN THE MIDCARGO COMPARTMENT, FLIGHT 132 WAS LOADED WITH A 104 POUND FIBER DRUM OF TEXTILE TREATMENT CHEMICALS. UNDECLARED AND IMPROPERLY PACKAGED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSIDE THE FIBER DRUM INCLUDED 5 GALLONS OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE SOLUTION AND 25 POUNDS OF A SODIUM ORTHOSILICATE-BASED MIXTURE. WHILE IN FLIGHT, A FLIGHT ATTENDANT AND A DEADHEADING FIRST OFFICER NOTIFIED THE COCKPIT CREW OF SMOKE IN THE PASSENGER CABIN.

THE PASSENGER CABIN FLOOR ABOVE THE CARGO COMPARTMENT WAS HOT AND SOFT, AND THE FLIGHT ATTENDANTS HAD TO MOVE PASSENGERS FROM THE AFFECTED AREA. THE CAPTAIN, WHO WAS AWARE OF A MECHANICAL DISCREPANCY WITH THE AUXILIARY POWER UNIT (APU) ON AN EARLIER FLIGHT WHICH RESULTED IN IN-FLIGHT FUMES, WAS SKEPTICAL ABOUT THE FLIGHT ATTENDANT'S REPORT OF SMOKE. NO IN-FLIGHT EMERGENCY WAS DECLARED. AFTER LANDING, THE CAPTAIN NOTIFIED NASHVILLE GROUND CONTROL ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF FIRE IN THE CARGO COMPARTMENT, AND HE REQUESTED FIRE EQUIPMENT. THE FLIGHT ATTENDANTS THEN INITIATED PROCEDURES TO EVACUATE THE AIRPLANE ON THE TAXIWAY.

ABOUT 2 MINUTES 8 SECONDS AFTER THE PLANE LANDED, THE 120 PASSENGERS AND 6 CREWMEMBERS BEGAN EVACUATING THE AIRPLANE. AFTER THE PLANE WAS EVACUATED, CRASH/FIRE/RESCUE PERSONNEL EXTINGUISHED THE FIRE IN THE CARGO COMPARTMENT.

Response History

August 23, 1993 · NTSB Correspondence · FAA

THE BOARD NOTED THAT THE FAA AND THE RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION (RSPA) HAVE COMPLETED AN EVALUATION OF THE TRANSPORT OF OXIDIZERS AND OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BY AIR. THE FAA AND RSPA HAVE CONCLUDED THAT OXIDIZERS AND OTHER CLASSES OF HAZAROUDS MATERIALS THAT ARE AUTHORIZED TO BE TRANSPORTED BY AIR ARE SAFE WHEN PROPERLY PACKAGED, DECLARED, AND SEGREGATED. HOWEVER, THE BOARD NOTES THAT THE FAA AND RSPA ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT UNDECLARED OR HIDDEN SHIPMENTS OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ARE A THREAT TO SAFETY AND HAVE TAKEN ACTIONS TO IMPROVE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THIS THREAT AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE REGULATIONS.

BASED ON THE FAA'S COMPLETION OF ITS EVALUATION OF THIS SAFETY ISSUE, RECOMMENDATION A-88-124 HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED "CLOSED--ACCEPTABLE ACTION."

June 30, 1993 · Recipient Response · FAA

THE FAA AND RSPA COMPLETED THEIR EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTING OXIDIZERS AND OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BY AIR. A REVIEW OF INCIDENT DATA INDICATES THAT WHEN PROPERLY PACKAGED, DECLARED, AND SEGREGATED, OXIDIZERS OFFER LITTLE THREAT TO THE TRAVELING PUBLIC. THE FAA BELIEVES THAT ADDDITIONAL RULEMAKING TO PROHIBIT OXIDIZERS IS NOT JUSTIFIED BASED ON THE CURRENT INCIDENT STATISTICS. THE FAA BELIEVES THAT EDUCATING THE TRAVELING PUBLIC OF THE HAZARDS POSED WHEN UNDECLARED SHIPMENTS ARE CARRIED ON BOARD AIRCRAFT IS A MORE APPROPRIATE APPROACH TO ADDRESS THIS SAFETY ISSUE.

April 19, 1993 · NTSB Correspondence · FAA

We classified Safety Recommendations A-88-122 through -124 as "Open--Acceptable Action" and Safety Recommendation A-88-127 as "Open--Unacceptable Action" on July 20, 1990, based on the FAA's letter of January 5, 1989. Our records show that we have not received any further response from the FAA regarding these recommendations. We would appreciate being informed about efforts that have been or are being made to implement these safety recommendations. Copies of the recommendation letter and related correspondence are enclosed for your information.

Read Recommendation

Recommendation Facts

Status
Closed - Acceptable Action
Issued
October 24, 1988
Priority
CLASS II
Recipient
FAA
Adopted
March 29, 1988
Closed
August 23, 1993
Related Investigation
DCA88MZ002
Related Report
HZM-88-02
July 20, 1990 · NTSB Correspondence · FAA

Safety Recommendation A-88-124 asks the FAA to evaluate the prohibition of oxidizers from cargo compartments that have no fire/smoke detection and extinguishing systems. It also recommends the evaluation of other classes of hazardous materials to determine if they should be prohibited. Two issues arise from the FAA response. One pertains to the responsibility of the FAA, and the other to the actual safety of allowing hazardous materials in compartments that have no fire/smoke detection and extinguishing systems.

The Safety Board notes the FAA's statement that it does not have the authority to prohibit or eliminate the transportation of hazardous materials by aircraft without appropriate regulatory change, and that the Department of Transportation's Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) would be the agency to initiate such rulemaking. Because the FAA has been working with the RSPA to evaluate the safety of hazardous materials transportation on passenger-carrying aircraft, Safety Recommendation A-88-124 has been classified as "Open--Acceptable Action" pending further response.

January 5, 1989 · Recipient Response · FAA

THE FAA DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO PROHIBIT OR ELIMINATE THE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BY AIRCRAFT WITHOUT APPROPRIATE REGULATORY CHANGE. THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANS PORTATION'S RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION (RSPA) IS THE AGENCY THAT WOULD HAVE TO INITIATE SUCH RULEMAKING. A TASK FORCE HAS BEEN FORMED CONSISTING OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE FAA AND RSPA'S OFFICE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES OF THIS SAFETY RECOMMENDATION.

THE TASK FORCE WILL REVIEW THE ADEQUACY OF EXISTING REGULATIONS AS THEY PERTAIN TO THE TRANSPORTATION OF OXIDIZERS AND OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON BOARD AIRCRAFT IN CLASS D CARGO COMPARTMENTS, EVALUATE ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CLASSED AS OXIDIZERS TO DETERMINE IF SOME OR ALL SHOULD BE PROHIBITED FROM TRANSPORTATION ON BOARD PASSENGER-CARRYING AIRCRAFT, AND DETERMINE IF OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROHIBITED.

AS STATED IN RESPONSE TO SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS A-88-122 AND -123, THE FAA IS CONSIDERING THE ISSUANCE OF A NOTICE OF A NPRM PROPOSING TO AMEND 14 CFR PARTS 25, 121, AND 135 TO REQUIRE FIRE AND SMOKE DETECTION SYSTEMS AND A FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM FOR ALL CLASS D CARGO COMPARTMENTS THAT ARE MORE THAN 200 CUBIC FEET IN VOLUME. THE FAA BELIEVES THAT THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF 14 CFR PART 25, COMBINED WITH THE RECENTLY COMPARTMENT LINER CARGO CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS OF 14 CFR 25.855, PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF SAFETY FOR CARGO COMPARTMENTS OF 200 CUBIC FEET OR LESS IN VOLUME. I WILL KEEP THE BOARD APPRISED OF THE FAA'S PROGRESS ON THIS EFFORT