Skip to Main Content
FlightPushFLIGHTPUSH
NTSB Safety Recommendations

Learn

Dashboard My Courses Mastery Map Practice Flight Bag

Resources

CFR & AIM FAA Orders Handbooks & Guides Certification Standards Pilot/Controller Glossary Advisory Circulars Legal Interpretations
Safety Center
Articles Trust Center
Help Center FAQ Status
  1. Safety Center
  2. NTSB Safety Recommendations
  3. NTSB A-18-024
Loading
flightpush.co home

NTSB · Safety Recommendation

Safety Recommendation A-18-024

Recommendation

TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Establish a group of human factors experts to review existing methods for presenting flight operations information to pilots, including flight releases and general aviation flight planning services (preflight) and aircraft communication addressing and reporting system messages and other in-flight information; create and publish guidance on best practices to organize, prioritize, and present this information in a manner that optimizes pilot review and retention of relevant information; and work with air carriers and service providers to implement solutions that are aligned with the guidance.

Safety Issue and Context

This report discusses the July 7, 2017, incident involving Air Canada flight 759, an Airbus A320-211, Canadian registration C-FKCK, which was cleared to land on runway 28R at San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, California, but instead lined up with parallel taxiway C. Four air carrier airplanes were on taxiway C awaiting clearance to take off from runway 28R. The incident airplane descended to an altitude of 100 ft above ground level and overflew the first airplane on the taxiway. The incident flight crew initiated a go-around, and the airplane reached a minimum altitude of about 60 ft and overflew the second airplane on the taxiway before starting to climb.

None of the 5 flight crewmembers and 135 passengers aboard the incident airplane were injured, and the incident airplane was not damaged.

Safety issues identified in this report include the need for consistent flight management system autotuning capability within an air carrier’s fleet, the need for more effective presentation of flight operations information to optimize pilot review and retention of relevant information, the need for airplanes landing at primary airports within Class B and Class C airspace to be equipped with a system that alerts pilots when an airplane is not aligned with a runway surface, the need for modifications to airport surface detection equipment systems to detect potential taxiway landings and provide alerts to air traffic controllers, the need for a method to more effectively signal a runway closure to pilots when at least one parallel runway remains in use, and the need for revisions to Canadian regulations to address the potential for fatigue for pilots on reserve duty who are called to operate evening flights that would extend into the pilots’ window of circadian low.

As a result of this investigation, the National Transportation Safety Board makes safety recommendations to the Federal Aviation Administration and Transport Canada.

Response History

September 29, 2023 · NTSB Correspondence · FAA

We note that the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization and Civil Aerospace Medical Institute are continuing to determine the most critical information for each phase of flight, as well as when and how that information should be delivered to pilots. Specifically, the controller surveys have been developed and the pilot surveys are being finalized. We also note that, although you anticipate completing the controller surveying by the end of fiscal year 2023, the schedule for surveying pilots cannot be determined until after you have complied with the Paperwork Reduction Act and coordinated with pilot labor groups.

You also reported plans to switch to a single notice-to-air-mission (NOTAM) system with improved search capabilities.

Although we continue to believe the multilevel review that you are conducting is responsive to this recommendation, we are concerned because this recommendation is almost 5 years old, and you have not finished developing the surveys. In addition, we are curious why the FAA has decided to distribute hard copies of the pilot surveys instead of a web-based version.

Pending our review of the requested information, the development of guidance based on the findings from the completed review, and a plan to ensure that this guidance is used by air carriers and service providers, Safety Recommendation A-18-24 remains classified OPEN-- ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE.

May 5, 2023 · Recipient Response · FAA

-From Billy Nolen, Acting Administrator: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) continues to advance the human factors research project addressing this safety recommendation. Researchers from the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization and Civil Aerospace Medical Institute have successfully coordinated the development of surveys for the air traffic controller population since our last update to the Board.

We anticipate completing surveying this population by the end of Fiscal Year 2023. Researchers are finalizing the coordination of the development of surveys for the pilot population, and the schedule for surveying this population will be determined by approvals needed to comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act and successful coordination with pilot labor groups.

Read Recommendation

Recommendation Facts

Status
Open - Acceptable Response
Issued
October 11, 2018
Priority
CLASS II
Recipient
FAA
Adopted
October 9, 2018
Related Investigation
DCA17IA148
Related Report
AIR-18-01

In the Board’s January 5, 2023, letter, it inquired about the status of the Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) Improvement Program (implemented as the NOTAM Modernization Initiative) as mandated by the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018. Since the start of the NOTAM Modernization Initiative, the FAA has taken steps to make it easier to find safety-critical flight information by reducing the number of NOTAMs pilots must review, making the retrieval of NOTAMs more user-friendly. Going forward, we plan to retire legacy databases to result in a single NOTAM system with improved search capabilities.

We will continue to share our progress towards NOTAM modernization with our aviation industry stakeholders through periodic briefings, which are open to the Board and its staff. Previously, we provided private briefings to Vice Chairman Bruce Landsberg on August 19, 2019, December 19, 2019, and November 12, 2020. The most recent briefing was provided on December 13, 2022, to the industry-led Aeronautical Information Services Reform Coalition. Additionally, updates are available at the following website:

https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/notam

I will keep the Board informed of the FAA’s progress on this human factors research and anticipate providing an update by April 30, 2024.

January 5, 2023 · NTSB Correspondence · FAA

We note that the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization (ATO) and Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) have finished reviewing the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Aviation Safety Reporting System Database and have developed draft surveys for pilot and air traffic control respondents who use or handle aeronautical information.

We also note that, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, you were unable to conduct in-person interviews and mission walk-throughs with flight crews; however, you have met with flying organizations in Alaska and the contiguous United States to discuss challenges they have experienced with notices to airmen (NOTAMs), and those findings have been incorporated into the pilot surveys. In addition, you are working with the Office of Personnel Management to obtain approval for surveying general aviation pilots.

We believe the actions that you reported are responsive to this recommendation; however, the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 included language that requires the FAA to implement a NOTAM Improvement Program and, 4 years after Congress enacted this requirement, we are not aware of any progress the FAA has made in making NOTAMs more readable and useful to pilots. We believe the goals specified in that program, if accomplished, would be an acceptable solution to this recommendation, and we encourage you to promptly complete your work to improve NOTAMs without further delay.

Pending the timely development of guidance based on the findings from your review, and a plan to ensure that this guidance is used by air carriers and service providers, Safety Recommendation A-18-24 remains classified OPEN-- ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE.

July 5, 2022 · Recipient Response · FAA

-From Billy Nolen, Acting Administrator: In our previous letter, we noted that the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Air Traffic Organization and Civil Aviation Medical Institute (CAMI) formulated a multi-level plan to address this recommendation. We have completed a review of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Aviation Safety Reporting System Database and developed draft surveys intended for pilot and air traffic control respondents who use or handle aeronautical information.

Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been unable to conduct in-person interviews/mission walk-throughs with flight crews to discuss what critical information they need at specific points in the flight and how to present that information effectively. However, the FAA has communicated with flying organizations in Alaska and the contiguous United States to discuss challenges encountered with Notices to Airmen and has incorporated these findings in our pilot surveys. Our next step is to begin coordinating the surveys with labor relations groups, which we anticipate completing by the end of the summer 2022.

Additionally, the Paperwork Reduction Act requires the FAA to seek approval from the Office of Personnel Management to survey general aviation pilots. While the FAA seeks this approval, researchers at CAMI are planning discussions with additional subject matter experts on the next steps concerning the range of observations and operations.

I will keep the Board informed of the FAA’s progress on this safety recommendation and anticipate providing an update by April 30, 2023.

April 21, 2022 · NTSB Correspondence · FAA

We note that the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization (ATO) and Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) are conducting a multilevel review to determine the most critical information for each phase of flight and when and how that information should be delivered to pilots. Pending the development of guidance based on the findings from the completed review, and a plan to ensure that this guidance is used by air carriers and service providers, Safety Recommendation A-18-24 remains classified OPEN-- ACCETPABLE RESPONSE.

March 31, 2021 · Recipient Response · FAA

-From Steve Dickson, Administrator: The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Air Traffic Organization and Civil Aviation Medical Institute formulated a plan to address this recommendation, which includes a multi-level review to:

• Determine what information is most critical during each flight operation phase. This would include: o A search of the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) database to determine where incidents have occurred because of a lack of information;

o Interviews/mission walkthroughs with flight crews to discuss what critical information is needed at what points in the flight, combined with discussions of how that information might most effectively be presented; and

o A survey provided to pilots in the part 91, 135, and 121 communities to provide additional clarification on the findings of the ASRS database search and the interviews.

• Determine the timing of delivery:

o Delivering information during planning or earlier in a flight to make planning/preparation more effective; and

o Early presentation combined with just-in-time information delivery to reduce the prospective memory burdens on the crews.

• Develop recommendations for how air traffic control (ATC) distributes the necessary information and how services will be employed. Flight crews and ATC personnel in simulator studies could explore the most promising interventions. These could include:

o A search of the Air Traffic Safety Action Program database to determine where incidents have occurred because of a lack of information;

o Interviews/cognitive walkthroughs with ATC to discuss potential changes in procedures and/or use of technology for communicating the critical information identified through the process described above;

o A survey provided to ATC to collect additional information;

o Laboratory simulations of flight deck and air traffic missions/operations may be conducted to empirically evaluate these recommendations; and

o Delivery mechanisms might incorporate graphical presentation on iPads/electronic flight bags or multi-function displays, controller–pilot Data Link Communications messages, or heads-up display overlays, where available.

The final research products will include a list of requirements and proposed methodology for identification, sorting, and delivery of information by phase of flight, type of operation, current conditions, relevant notice to airmen, etc., to increase the probability of delivering critical information in an easily understandable, actionable format. Any proposed requirements for data display, sorting, etc., on one or more systems will be discussed with the appropriate program offices for implementation, addressing what can readily be implemented with few changes and what might be possible as systems evolve in the future.

I will keep the Board informed of the FAA’s progress on this safety recommendation and anticipate providing an update by October 31, 2021.

May 10, 2019 · NTSB Correspondence · FAA

We note that you would like to meet with our staff to discuss the intent of this recommendation and we are working with your staff to finalize a date. Pending the results of that meeting and a plan for developing the recommended guidance, Safety Recommendation A 18-24 is classified OPEN--ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE.

February 7, 2019 · Recipient Response · FAA

-From Daniel K. Elwell, Acting Administrator: This recommendation requires review. coordination, and possible action or multiple lines of business. Before we propose any plan of action. we must review this recommendation more carefully and meet with the Board to gain a better understanding of the Board’s intent with this safety recommendation. Based on this review and meeting, we will determine whether action is required and. if so. how best to proceed.

I will keep the Board informed of the FAA ·s progress on these safety recommendations and anticipate providing an update by February 2020.

October 11, 2018 · NTSB Correspondence · FAA

On September 25, 2018, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) adopted its aircraft incident report, Taxiway Overflight, Air Canada Flight 759, Airbus A320-211, C-FKCK, San Francisco, California, July 7, 2017 (AIR 18/01). The details of the incident investigation and the resulting safety recommendations may be found in the attached report, which can also be accessed at http://www.ntsb.gov.

Among the safety recommendations are six issued to the Federal Aviation Administration, which can be found on pages 69-70 of the report.

The NTSB is vitally interested in these recommendations because they are designed to prevent accidents and save lives. We would appreciate a response within 90 days, detailing the actions you have taken or intend to take to implement the recommendations. When replying, please refer to the safety recommendations by number. We encourage you to submit your response to correspondence@ntsb.gov. If it exceeds 10 megabytes, including attachments, please e-mail us at the same address for instructions. Please do not submit both an electronic copy and a hard copy of the same response.