Skip to Main Content
FlightPushFLIGHTPUSH
NTSB Safety Recommendations

Learn

Dashboard My Courses Mastery Map Practice Flight Bag

Resources

CFR & AIM FAA Orders Handbooks & Guides Certification Standards Pilot/Controller Glossary Advisory Circulars Legal Interpretations
Safety Center
Articles Trust Center
Help Center FAQ Status
  1. Safety Center
  2. NTSB Safety Recommendations
  3. NTSB A-16-013
Loading
flightpush.co home

NTSB · Safety Recommendation

Safety Recommendation A-16-013

Recommendation

TO THE GENERAL AVIATION MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION: Work with the Federal Aviation Administration to develop a system that can automatically alert pilots when the ice protection systems should be activated on turbofan airplanes that require a type rating and are certified for single-pilot operations and flight in icing conditions.

Safety Issue and Context

On December 8, 2014, about 1041 eastern standard time, an Embraer EMB-500 airplane (marketed as the Phenom 100), N100EQ, registered to and operated by Sage Aviation LLC, crashed while on approach to runway 14 at Montgomery County Airpark (GAI), Gaithersburg, Maryland. The airplane impacted three houses and the ground about 3/4 mile from the approach end of the runway. A postcrash fire involving the airplane and one of the three houses, which contained three occupants, ensued. The pilot, the two passengers, and the three people in the house died as a result of the accident. The airplane was destroyed by impact forces and postcrash fire.

The flight was operating on an instrument flight rules flight plan under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident.

Data from the airplane’s cockpit voice and data recorder (CVDR) indicated that the takeoff about 0945 from Horace Williams Airport, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and the cruise portion of the flight were uneventful.1 CVDR data showed that about 15 minutes after takeoff, the passenger in the right cockpit seat made a statement that the airplane was “in the clouds.” A few seconds later, the airplane’s engine anti-ice system and the wing and horizontal stabilizer deice system were manually activated for about 2 minutes before they were manually turned off.

About 6 minutes later, a recording from the automated weather observing system (AWOS) at GAI began transmitting over the pilot’s audio channel, containing sufficient information to indicate that conditions were conducive to icing during the approach to GAI.2 The CVDR recorded no activity or faults during the rest of the flight for either ice protection system, indicating that the pilot did not turn the systems back on.

The NTSB determines that the probable cause of this accident was the pilot’s conduct of an approach in structural icing conditions without turning on the airplane’s wing and horizontal stabilizer deice system, leading to ice accumulation on those surfaces, and without using the appropriate landing performance speeds for the weather conditions and airplane weight, as indicated in the airplane’s standard operating procedures, which together resulted in an aerodynamic stall at an altitude at which a recovery was not possible.

Response History

July 21, 2021 · NTSB Correspondence · General Aviation Manufacturers Association

We have not received any information from GAMA regarding this recommendation since your September 20, 2016, letter, which said that GAMA was organizing a workshop on icing, aircraft aerodynamics, and loss of control, among other important general aviation safety issues. You further reported that information from this workshop would be forwarded to ASTM International’s F44 Committee on General Aviation Aircraft, which would develop standards for airplanes certified to fly into icing conditions. Pending our review of the developed standards and completion of the recommended actions, Safety Recommendation A-16-13 was classified OPEN-- ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE on October 31, 2016.

Copies of previous correspondence are enclosed.

We normally expect actions to address our recommendations to be completed within 3 to 5 years. It has now been over 5 years since this recommendation was issued, and we have not received any additional information regarding your actions to implement it. We would appreciate receiving a response from you within 90 days regarding actions that you have completed or planned to address this recommendation. Please update us at ExecutiveSecretariat@ntsb.gov on your progress toward implementing this recommendation, and do not submit both an electronic and a hard copy of the same response.

Thank you in advance for your prompt response and for your commitment to aviation safety.

October 31, 2016 · NTSB Correspondence · General Aviation Manufacturers Association

We note that you are organizing a workshop that will be held October 25¬¬¬–27, 2016, in Orlando, Florida, which will address icing, aircraft aerodynamics, and loss of control, among other important general aviation safety issues. The planned output of the workshop will be a comprehensive set of standards that address all types of general aviation airplanes and that will be forwarded to ASTM International’s F44 Committee on General Aviation Aircraft. The committee will then develop standards for airplanes certified to fly into icing conditions.

Earlier this year, the FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to revise Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations

Read Recommendation

Recommendation Facts

Status
Open - Acceptable Response
Issued
June 21, 2016
Priority
CLASS II
Recipient
General Aviation Manufacturers Association
Adopted
June 13, 2016
Related Investigation
DCA15MA029
Related Report
AAR-16-01
Part 23
, which contains the airworthiness standards for general aviation airplanes. According to the NPRM,
Part 23
would be revised to replace the current design standards with “performance standards” that would use consensus industry standards (such as those developed by the ASTM F44 committee) as a method to show compliance. We agree that this recommendation and the activities you described in your letter are good examples of how issues identified in our accident investigations may be addressed by the FAA when
Part 23
is revised.

We welcome the opportunity that you proposed to meet and discuss the actions that you and the ASTM F44 committee are taking in response to this recommendation, and how the associated safety improvements will be incorporated into future airplanes.

Pending completion of actions that satisfy Safety Recommendation A-16-013, it is classified OPEN—ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE.

September 20, 2016 · Recipient Response · General Aviation Manufacturers Association

-From Jens C. Henning, Vice President, Operations: GAMA welcomes this recommendation and notes that it aligns with work already underway to improve general aviation safety, including in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Part 23 notice for proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and the associated ASTM F44, General Aviation Aircraft, workgroup. The Part 23 NPRM will establish a performance-based regulatory framework that will help facilitate the introduction and wider use of safety-enhancing equipment in both new and existing general aviation aircraft.

Key focus areas of these new regulations and standards include reducing the risk of loss of control and improving occupant protection—both of which are on the NTSB’s 2016 Most Wanted List. This work is focused on angle of attack information, envelope protection technology, low-cost autopilots, and other situational awareness technologies, as well as future design methodologies.

GAMA is organizing a workshop that will be held October 25-27 in Orlando, Florida, which will address, inter alia, icing, aircraft aerodynamics, and loss of control. This workshop will include safety experts from around the aviation industry as well as regulators from the FAA, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Brazil (ANAC), Canada (TCCA), China (CAAC), Australia (CAA) and New Zealand (NZCAA) as well as manufacturers of all turbofan airplanes that are certified for single-pilot operations and flight in icing conditions – per the recommendation – along with suppliers, operators and many more.

GAMA has invited NTSB experts to participate in the workshop and provide a detailed overview of both the A-16-13 recommendation and the NTSB’s overall technical expertise about the risk of icing gathered from general aviation accident investigations. The output of the workshop will be a comprehensive set of standards that address all types of general aviation airplanes. Based upon discussion and feedback from the world’s aviation experts in these areas, ASTM F44 will advance proportional standards to assure the safety of all airplanes which are certified for flight into known icing.

The FAA has stated that the revision to Part 23 regulations, which will recognize the standards developed by ASTM F44, are on track for issuance of a final rule by the end of 2016.

GAMA would be pleased to provide the NTSB with a detailed overview of the new standards for icing certification, how annunciation to the pilots would be implemented, and the final structure of the new Part 23 regulations after the technical work has been completed. GAMA encourages the NTSB to illustrate to the U.S. Department of Transportation and the FAA the importance of the Part 23 rulemaking in maximizing the safety of general aviation in the future.