Skip to Main Content
FlightPushFLIGHTPUSH
Legal Interpretations

Learn

Dashboard My Courses Mastery Map Practice Flight Bag

Resources

CFR & AIM FAA Orders Handbooks & Guides Certification Standards Pilot/Controller Glossary Advisory Circulars Legal Interpretations
Safety Center
Articles Trust Center
Help Center FAQ Status
  1. Reference Library
  2. Legal Interpretations
  3. Interpretation
Loading
flightpush.co home
Loading reference

Legal Interpretations

← Previous InterpretationNext Interpretation →

Morris 2008

1 item · About 66 KB · Auto-updates · Removed when you log out

Summary

The Question

May a pilot accept an ATC clearance for a departure procedure with a non-standard climb gradient knowing the aircraft cannot meet it if an engine fails on takeoff?

Background

An individual asked about departure procedures and obstacle departure procedures with non-standard climb gradients for aircraft operated under 14 CFR parts 91 and 135.

The FAA’s Interpretation

Not for a part 135 operation. 14 CFR 91.175(f)(4) requires part 121 and 135 operators to use a takeoff obstacle clearance procedure meeting the takeoff limits of 14 CFR part 135 subpart I, so accepting and flying a procedure the aircraft cannot meet after an engine failure would violate subpart I. For any operation, under part 91 or 135, the pilot must preplan whether the aircraft can meet the climb gradient.

Requester
Morris
Issued
September 30, 2008
Subjects
General Operating & Flight Rules · Air Carrier & Commercial Operations · Rulemaking & Enforcement

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR Part 13
  • 14 CFR 91.175
  • 14 CFR Part 121
  • 14 CFR 135.367
  • 14 CFR 135.379
  • 14 CFR 135.389

Page 1

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation ~
Administration
SEP 3 0 2008
Mis. Leslie A. Morris
Dear Mrs. Morris
Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave .. S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20591

This responds to your inquiry whether a pilot can accept a clearance from air traffic control (ATC) for a standard instrument departure procedure (SlD) or an Obstacle Departure Procedure (ODP), with a non-standard climb gradient if the pilot knows that the aircraft cannot meet the climb gradient if an engine is lost on takeoff. You reference aircraft operations under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations parts 91and135. (14 CFR parts 91 and 13 5).

Section 91.175(f)(4) applies to a person operating an aircraft under part 121, 125, 129 or 135 and provides that "Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (f)(3) of this section, no pilot may takeoff from an airport under IFR ....unless for part 121 and 135 operators, the pilot uses a takeoff obstacle clearance or avoidance procedure that ensures compliance with the applicable airplane performance operating limitation requirements under part 121, subpart I or part 135, subpart I, for takeoff at that airport."

Subpart I of Part 13 5 specifies the takeoff limitations for the three categories of aircraft that are governed by this part. 1 If a pilot accepts an A TC clearance for a departure procedure for which that ai~craft is unable to meet the necessary requirements in the event of engine failure and conducts the operation, it would place the pilot in noncompliance with the applicable regulation in subpart I of part 135.

For any operation, regardless of whether conducted under part 91 or 135, the pilot must preplan to determine whether the aircraft can meet the climb gradient required by the departure procedure and consider both the effect of degraded climb performance and the action to take in the event of engine failure during the departure.2 It is the pilot's · responsibility to determine whether the operation can be conducte9_within _the operating limitations specified for the particular aircraft.

1Since you did not specify a particular aircraft category, we direct you to review the following sections:

§ 135.367--large transport category airplanes: reciprocating engine powered;§ 135.379--large transport category airplanes, turbine engine powered; and§ 135.389-- large transport category airplane. These sections specify various takeoff requirements including obstacle clearance requirements. 2 See the Aeronautical Information Manual, paragraph 5-2-8.

Page 2

I hope this infonnation responds to your questions. This response has been prepared by Lorelei Peter and has been coordinated with the Air Transportation Division, Flight Standards Service. If you have questions, please contact Ms. Peter at 202-267-3134.

Sincerely,

~:t:."Jvkfi -Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations, AGC-200

Regulations Referenced

14 CFR Part 9114 CFR 91.17514 CFR Part 12114 CFR Part 13514 CFR 135.36714 CFR 135.37914 CFR 135.389

Snapshot retrieved August 6, 2026.

Summary

The Question

May a pilot accept an ATC clearance for a departure procedure with a non-standard climb gradient knowing the aircraft cannot meet it if an engine fails on takeoff?

Background

An individual asked about departure procedures and obstacle departure procedures with non-standard climb gradients for aircraft operated under 14 CFR parts 91 and 135.

The FAA’s Interpretation

Not for a part 135 operation. 14 CFR 91.175(f)(4) requires part 121 and 135 operators to use a takeoff obstacle clearance procedure meeting the takeoff limits of 14 CFR part 135 subpart I, so accepting and flying a procedure the aircraft cannot meet after an engine failure would violate subpart I. For any operation, under part 91 or 135, the pilot must preplan whether the aircraft can meet the climb gradient.

Requester
Morris
Issued
September 30, 2008
Subjects
General Operating & Flight Rules · Air Carrier & Commercial Operations · Rulemaking & Enforcement

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR Part 13
  • 14 CFR 91.175
  • 14 CFR Part 121
  • 14 CFR 135.367
  • 14 CFR 135.379
  • 14 CFR 135.389