Skip to Main Content
FlightPushFLIGHTPUSH
Legal Interpretations

Learn

Dashboard My Courses Mastery Map Practice Flight Bag

Resources

CFR & AIM FAA Orders Handbooks & Guides Certification Standards Pilot/Controller Glossary Advisory Circulars Legal Interpretations
Safety Center
Articles Trust Center
Help Center FAQ Status
  1. Reference Library
  2. Legal Interpretations
  3. Interpretation
Loading
flightpush.co home
Loading reference

Legal Interpretations

← Previous InterpretationNext Interpretation →

Lamb-Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney-2 2010

1 item · About 66 KB · Auto-updates · Removed when you log out

Summary

The Question

Under 14 CFR 61.113(c), may a private pilot's employer or a company the pilot owns or partners in pay the pilot's pro rata share of flight expenses?

Background

An attorney with Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney posed four expense-sharing scenarios for bona fide common-purpose flights. Passengers pay pro rata; the pilot's share comes from the pilot, the pilot's employer, the pilot's company, or a company where the pilot is a partner.

The FAA’s Interpretation

No. Only the scenario in which the pilot and passengers each pay a pro rata share is permissible. The FAA has consistently interpreted 14 CFR 61.113(c) to let a private pilot seek reimbursement only from fellow passengers, not from a third party such as an employer. Third-party reimbursement in the other three scenarios means the pilot actually pays less than a pro rata share, which is impermissible.

Requester
Lamb
Organization
Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney
Issued
July 19, 2010
Subject
Pilot Certification & Privileges

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR 61.113

Page 1

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
JUL 19 2010
Ronald R. Lamb
Office of the Chief Counsel
Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, LLP
Twenty-Second Floor
400 Capitol Mall
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Mr. Lamb:
800 Independence Ave., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20591

This responds to your request for legal interpretation dated March 25, 2010, requesting clarification concerning the application of 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113(c). Your letter presents four expense-sharing scenarios (each assuming.the flight has a bona fide common purpose) including: (I) the pilot and passengers each pay a pro rata share; (2) the passengers each pay a pro rata share, and the pilot's employer pays the pilot's pro rata share; (3) the passengers each pay a pro rata share, and the company owned by the pilot pays the pilot's pro rata share; and (4) the 'passengers each pay a pro rata share, and the company in which the pilot is a partn~r pays the pilot's pro rata share. Your letter asks which of these scenarios are permissible under § 61.113(c).

Section 61.113(c) states, in relevant part, that a private pilot may not pay less than the pro rata share of the operating expenses of a flight with passengers, provided the expenses involve only fuel, oil, airport expenditures, or rental fees. As stated in the March 1, 2010 interpretation to you, the FAA consistently has interpreted § 61.113(c) to permit a private pilot to seek reimbursement only from fellow passengers and not from a third party such as an employer. Legal Interpretation to Ronald R. Lamb (Mar. 1, 2010); see also Legal Interpretation to Guy Mangiamele (Mar. 4, 2009) ("As noted in the preamble of the final rule, the FAA determined that a private pilot may not pay less than the pro rata share of operating expenses for the flight because 'if pilots pay less, they would not just be sharing expenses but would actually be flying for compensation or hire."'). Accordingly, only the expense sharing in your first scenario of the pilot and passengers each paying a pro rata share of expenses for a flight with a bona fide common purpose is permissible under § 61.113(c). The expense sharing in your other three scenarios involve the pilot receiving reimbursement from passengers and from a third-party employer (or company in which the pilot has an ownership interest), and that third-party reimbursement is impermissible because the pilot actually is paying less than a pro rata share of expenses.

Page 2

This response was prepared by Robert Hawks, an Attorney in the Regulations Division of the Office of Chief Counsel and coordinated with the General Aviation and Commercial Division of Flight Standards Service. We hope this response has been helpful to you. If you have additional questions regarding this matter, please contact us at your convenience at (202) 267-3073.

Sincerely, ·

~.f-¥J.-

Rebecca B. MacPherson

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations, AGC-200

Regulations Referenced

14 CFR 61.113

Snapshot retrieved August 6, 2026.

Summary

The Question

Under 14 CFR 61.113(c), may a private pilot's employer or a company the pilot owns or partners in pay the pilot's pro rata share of flight expenses?

Background

An attorney with Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney posed four expense-sharing scenarios for bona fide common-purpose flights. Passengers pay pro rata; the pilot's share comes from the pilot, the pilot's employer, the pilot's company, or a company where the pilot is a partner.

The FAA’s Interpretation

No. Only the scenario in which the pilot and passengers each pay a pro rata share is permissible. The FAA has consistently interpreted 14 CFR 61.113(c) to let a private pilot seek reimbursement only from fellow passengers, not from a third party such as an employer. Third-party reimbursement in the other three scenarios means the pilot actually pays less than a pro rata share, which is impermissible.

Requester
Lamb
Organization
Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney
Issued
July 19, 2010
Subject
Pilot Certification & Privileges

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR 61.113