Skip to Main Content
FlightPushFLIGHTPUSH
Legal Interpretations

Learn

Dashboard My Courses Mastery Map Practice Flight Bag

Resources

CFR & AIM FAA Orders Handbooks & Guides Certification Standards Pilot/Controller Glossary Advisory Circulars Legal Interpretations
Safety Center
Articles Trust Center
Help Center FAQ Status
  1. Reference Library
  2. Legal Interpretations
  3. Interpretation
Loading
flightpush.co home
Loading reference

Legal Interpretations

← Previous InterpretationNext Interpretation →

Silverberg 2009

1 item · About 66 KB · Auto-updates · Removed when you log out

Summary

The Question

Does the FAA treat a volunteer pilot's charitable tax deduction for the costs of rescue-animal transport flights as compensation prohibited under 14 CFR 61.113?

Background

Pilots-n-Paws, a 501(c)(3) organization, runs a website where people seeking transport for rescue animals meet volunteer pilots. It is not a party to their agreements and requires pilots to fly without expectation of compensation, in compliance with 14 CFR 61.113.

The FAA’s Interpretation

Not by itself. Historically the FAA treated such deductions as compensation not permitted under 14 CFR 61.113, but under the enforcement policy in the 2005 Kirwan interpretation (FAA Order 8900.1), a charitable deduction of flight costs, standing alone, is not treated as "compensation or hire." The policy does not apply if the deduction is coupled with any reimbursement of expenses or other compensation, and it is unchanged for animal-rescue flights.

Requester
Silverberg
Issued
October 16, 2009
Subjects
Pilot Certification & Privileges · Definitions

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR Part 1
  • 14 CFR 61.113

Page 1

U.S. Deportment
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
OCT 1 6 2009
Mr. Robert P. Silverberg
Re: Compassionate flights
Dear Mr. Silverberg,
Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave .. S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20591

This is in response to your June 17, 2009, request for a legal interpretation of the Federal Aviation Administration's policy relating to charitable flights. You specifically seek clarification of the FAA compassionate flight policy as it relates to the deductibility of flight related expenses incurred by uncompensated volunteer pilots who transport rescue animals by aircraft. The facts as outlined in your letter are as follows:

Pilots-n-Paws is a 50l(c)(3) designated organization dedicated to saving the lives of innocent animals that operates a website to serve as an electronic meeting place for those seeking transportation of rescue animals and volunteer pilots who are willing to transport the animals from overcrowded shelters to those that can better acconunodate them. Individuals seeking transportation for rescue animals and volunteer pilots can meet on the website and make necessary bilateral agreements to do so. Pilots-n-Paws is not a party to such agreements, and does not provide any flight services. Pilots-n-Paws acts only as a facilitator via its website, where it makes clear that pilots who wish_to volunteer their time and aircraft must do so without any expectation of compensation and in complilU}ce with the requirements of section 61.113.

We believe that this issue was addressed in the letter of Rebecca B. Macpherson, Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division, to Joseph A. Kirwan, dated May 27, 2005, (the "Kirwan letter"). In the Kirwan letter, we addressed whether a pilot could take a tax deduction for expenses related to charitable flights among other issues. We know that historically the FAA has considered the taking of a tax deduction for these types of flights to constitute a form of compensation not permitted under section 61.113. However, we stated in Kirwan that our enforcement policy now provides as follows:

Since Congress has specifically provided for the tax deductibility of some costs of charitable acts, the FAA will not treat charitable deductions of such costs, standing alone, as constituting "compensation or hire" for the purpose of enforcing [the Federal Aviation Regulations)." If taking a charitable tax deduction for transporting persons or property is coupled with any ·

Page 2

reimbursement of expenses, or other compensation of any kind, then this policy does not apply. See FAA Order 8900.1, Vol. 4, Chap. 5, § 1, ~ 4-922). Our policy on this issue remains unchanged, and it is not altered by the fact that the flights are conducted to rescue animals.

We trust that the foregoing interpretation is responsive to your inquiry. This interpretation was prepared by the Operations Law Branch of the Office of the Chief Counsel, and coordinated with the Air Transportation and General Aviation Divisions of the Flight Standards Service. Please contact us at (202) 267-3073 if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

~~A-hf~

Rebecca B. ~:herson

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations, AGC-200

Regulations Referenced

14 CFR 61.113

Snapshot retrieved August 6, 2026.

Summary

The Question

Does the FAA treat a volunteer pilot's charitable tax deduction for the costs of rescue-animal transport flights as compensation prohibited under 14 CFR 61.113?

Background

Pilots-n-Paws, a 501(c)(3) organization, runs a website where people seeking transport for rescue animals meet volunteer pilots. It is not a party to their agreements and requires pilots to fly without expectation of compensation, in compliance with 14 CFR 61.113.

The FAA’s Interpretation

Not by itself. Historically the FAA treated such deductions as compensation not permitted under 14 CFR 61.113, but under the enforcement policy in the 2005 Kirwan interpretation (FAA Order 8900.1), a charitable deduction of flight costs, standing alone, is not treated as "compensation or hire." The policy does not apply if the deduction is coupled with any reimbursement of expenses or other compensation, and it is unchanged for animal-rescue flights.

Requester
Silverberg
Issued
October 16, 2009
Subjects
Pilot Certification & Privileges · Definitions

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR Part 1
  • 14 CFR 61.113