Skip to Main Content
FlightPushFLIGHTPUSH
Legal Interpretations

Learn

Dashboard My Courses Mastery Map Practice Flight Bag

Resources

CFR & AIM FAA Orders Handbooks & Guides Certification Standards Pilot/Controller Glossary Advisory Circulars Legal Interpretations
Safety Center
Articles Trust Center
Help Center FAQ Status
  1. Reference Library
  2. Legal Interpretations
  3. Interpretation
Loading
flightpush.co home
Loading reference

Legal Interpretations

← Previous InterpretationNext Interpretation →

Milner-Riverside Flight Center 2010

1 item · About 66 KB · Auto-updates · Removed when you log out

Summary

The Question

May the FAA deny a 14 CFR part 141 pilot school examining authority because enough designated pilot examiners already serve the area?

Background

Riverside Flight Center, a Tulsa pilot school, was denied examining authority under 14 CFR 141.63 after an Aviation Safety Inspector determined there were enough designees in and around Tulsa to avoid delays in scheduling or processing its applicants.

The FAA’s Interpretation

No. Under 14 CFR 141.9, the FAA issues examining authority when the school and course meet subpart D of 14 CFR part 141, and the rule does not indicate discretion to deny a qualifying school. The need-based provision of 14 CFR 183.11(b) does not apply because school employees who give flight tests are not 14 CFR part 183 designated pilot examiners; the inspector should have evaluated the school against 14 CFR 141.63.

Requester
Milner
Organization
Riverside Flight Center
Issued
September 24, 2010
Subject
Training Schools & Centers

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR 141.9
  • 14 CFR 141.63
  • 14 CFR 141.83
  • 14 CFR 183.11

Page 1

U.S. Deportment
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
SEP 2 4 2010
Yuri Milner
Vice President
Riverside Flight Center
241 Cessna Dr.
Tulsa, OK 74132
Dear Mr. Milner:
Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20591

This letter responds to the request for a legal interpretation that you mailed to this office on May 18, 2010. Specifically, you have asked several questions regarding the denial of your application for examining authority under 14 C.F.R. § 141.63. As you stated in your letter, your application for examining authority was denied based on the Aviation Safety Inspector's (ASI) determination that there were sufficient designees in and around the Tulsa area to avoid delays in the scheduling or processing of applicants from your pilot school. Section 141.9 states that "[t ]he FAA issues examining authority to a pilot school for a training course if the pilot school and its training course meet the requirements of subpart D" of part 141. This rule language does not indicate that the FAA bas discretion to deny examining authority to a pilot school that has satisfied the requirements set forth in part 141. In an August 2009 final rule, the FAA underscored this view by stating that we "will issue examining authority as long as [the pilot school] meets the qualification requirements of§ 141.63 for that specific course of training." 74 FR 42500, 42538, Aug. 21, 2009. In the case of your denial, it appears that the ASI relied on § 183.11 , which permits any local Flight Standards Inspector to select a pilot examiner whenever he determines there is a need for one. 14 C.F.R. § 183. l l(b). Because employees who administer flight tests at a part 141 pilot school that holds examining authority are not designated pilot examiners within the context of part 183, they are not subject to the necessity provision of§ 183.11. As such, upon your application for examining authority, the ASI should have conducted an investigation in accordance with FAA guidance to determine whether your pilot school and the training courses for which you are seeking examining authority meet the requirements of § 141.63. See FAA Order 8900.1, Vol. 5, Chapter 12, Sec. 4.

In reaching this conclusion, we note that a 1987 legal interpretation from this office stated that"[e]mployees of a certificated pilot school that holds an examining authority who give flight tests to the school ' s students or graduates are designated examiners" for the purpose of determining whether a pilot school had satisfied the quality of training standard set forth in § 141.83. This interpretation was limited in scope and did not confer any sort of designee

Page 2

status within the meaning of part 183 upon employees of pilot schools that hold examining authority.

In a related question, you have asked whether a pilot school may apply for examining authority without having an approved Airmen Certification Representative (ACR). FAA guidance clearly indicates that a pilot school need not have an ACR to hold examining authority. FAA Order 8900.l, Vol. 5, Chpt. 12, Sec. 4, 5-1852. This response was prepared by Anne Moore, an Attorney in the Regulations Division of the Office of the Chief Counsel, and coordinated with the Certification and General Aviation Operations Branch of Flight Standards Service. We hope this response has been helpful to you. If you have additional questions regarding this matter, please contact us at your convenience at (202) 267-3073.

Sincerely,

P-?-¥-fl-Rebecca B. MacPherson

Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division

Regulations Referenced

14 CFR 141.6314 CFR 141.914 CFR Part 14114 CFR 141.83

Snapshot retrieved August 6, 2026.

Summary

The Question

May the FAA deny a 14 CFR part 141 pilot school examining authority because enough designated pilot examiners already serve the area?

Background

Riverside Flight Center, a Tulsa pilot school, was denied examining authority under 14 CFR 141.63 after an Aviation Safety Inspector determined there were enough designees in and around Tulsa to avoid delays in scheduling or processing its applicants.

The FAA’s Interpretation

No. Under 14 CFR 141.9, the FAA issues examining authority when the school and course meet subpart D of 14 CFR part 141, and the rule does not indicate discretion to deny a qualifying school. The need-based provision of 14 CFR 183.11(b) does not apply because school employees who give flight tests are not 14 CFR part 183 designated pilot examiners; the inspector should have evaluated the school against 14 CFR 141.63.

Requester
Milner
Organization
Riverside Flight Center
Issued
September 24, 2010
Subject
Training Schools & Centers

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR 141.9
  • 14 CFR 141.63
  • 14 CFR 141.83
  • 14 CFR 183.11