Skip to Main Content
FlightPushFLIGHTPUSH
Legal Interpretations

Learn

Dashboard My Courses Mastery Map Practice Flight Bag

Resources

CFR & AIM FAA Orders Handbooks & Guides Certification Standards Pilot/Controller Glossary Advisory Circulars Legal Interpretations
Safety Center
Articles Trust Center
Help Center FAQ Status
  1. Reference Library
  2. Legal Interpretations
  3. Interpretation
Loading
flightpush.co home
Loading reference

Legal Interpretations

← Previous InterpretationNext Interpretation →

Bartholomew 1992

1 item · About 66 KB · Auto-updates · Removed when you log out

Summary

The Question

Does a compensated flight made solely to dispose of cremated human remains aloft, carrying only the pilot and no cargo, require a Part 135 certificate?

Background

An individual asked by telephone about a compensated, daytime VFR flight whose sole purpose would be disposing of cremated human remains aloft, carrying no one but the pilot and no cargo. The pilot would hold a commercial pilot certificate.

The FAA’s Interpretation

No. The circumstances appear to describe aerial work operations excepted by 14 CFR 135.1(b)(4), so the regulations would not require the operator to hold a Part 135 certificate. The FAA added that 14 CFR part 61 allows only holders of an ATP or commercial pilot certificate to act as pilot in command for compensation or hire, which the commercial pilot satisfies.

Requester
Bartholomew
Issued
July 31, 1992
Subjects
Pilot Certification & Privileges · Air Carrier & Commercial Operations

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR Part 61
  • 14 CFR 135.1

Page 1

July 31, 1992
Cory Bartholomew
Dear Mr. Bartholomew:

This responds to your telephone inquiry of July 30, 1992, in which you asked whether a Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR)

Part 135 commercial operator certificate would be required under the following circumstances:

1. The flight would be for compensation.

2. The sole purpose of the flight would be for the aloft disposal of cremated human remains.

3. The flight would carry no one other than the pilot.

4. The flight would carry no cargo.

You also stated that the flight would be conducted at daytime and under VFR conditions, and that the pilot would hold a

Commercial Pilot Certificate.

These circumstances appear to describe the type of aerial work operations that are excepted by FAR § 135.1(b) (4); therefore, the

FAR would not require the operator to hold a Part 135 certificate.

Sincerely,

CAREY TERASAKI

General Attorney

1 In addition, Part 61 of the FAR prohibits anyone other than the holder of an Airline Transport Pilot or Commercial Pilot Certificate to act as pilot in command for compensation or hire. Because the pilot you described would hold a commercial certificate, those provisions of the FAR would be satisfied.

Regulations Referenced

14 CFR Part 13514 CFR 135.114 CFR Part 61

Snapshot retrieved August 6, 2026.

Summary

The Question

Does a compensated flight made solely to dispose of cremated human remains aloft, carrying only the pilot and no cargo, require a Part 135 certificate?

Background

An individual asked by telephone about a compensated, daytime VFR flight whose sole purpose would be disposing of cremated human remains aloft, carrying no one but the pilot and no cargo. The pilot would hold a commercial pilot certificate.

The FAA’s Interpretation

No. The circumstances appear to describe aerial work operations excepted by 14 CFR 135.1(b)(4), so the regulations would not require the operator to hold a Part 135 certificate. The FAA added that 14 CFR part 61 allows only holders of an ATP or commercial pilot certificate to act as pilot in command for compensation or hire, which the commercial pilot satisfies.

Requester
Bartholomew
Issued
July 31, 1992
Subjects
Pilot Certification & Privileges · Air Carrier & Commercial Operations

Regulations Cited

  • 14 CFR Part 61
  • 14 CFR 135.1