IFH 1-30

increased by ¼ mile. [Figure 1-23] A note in this section might read, “Inoperative Table does not apply to ALS or HIRL Runway 13L.” RNAV Instrument Approach Charts To avoid unnecessary duplication and proliferation of approach charts, approach minimums for unaugmented GPS, Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) are published on the same approach chart as lateral navigation/vertical navigation (LNAV/VNAV). Other types of equipment may be authorized to conduct the approach based on the minima notes in the front of the TPP approach chart books. Approach charts titled “RNAV RWY XX” may be used by aircraft with navigation systems that meet the required navigational performance (RNP) values for each segment of the approach. [Figure 1-24] The chart may contain as many as four lines of approach minimums: global landing system (GLS), WAAS and LAAS, LNAV/VNAV, LNAV, and circling. LNAV/VNAV is an instrument approach with lateral and vertical guidance with integrity limits similar to barometric vertical navigation (BARO VNAV). RNAV procedures that incorporate a final approach stepdown fix may be published without vertical navigation on a separate chart also titled RNAV. During a transition period when GPS procedures are undergoing revision to a new title, both RNAV and GPS approach charts and formats are published. ATC clearance for the RNAV procedure authorizes a properly certificated pilot to utilize any landing minimums for which the aircraft is certified. Chart terminology changes slightly to support the new procedure types: 1. DA replaces the term DH. DA conforms to the international convention where altitudes relate to MSL and heights relate to AGL. DA will eventually be published for other types of IAPs with vertical guidance, as well. DA indicates to the pilot that the published descent profile is flown to the DA (MSL), where a missed approach is initiated if visual references for landing are not established. Obstacle clearance is provided to allow a momentary descent below DA while transitioning from the final approach to the missed approach. The aircraft is expected to follow the missed approach instructions while continuing along the published final approach course to at least the published runway threshold waypoint or MAP (if not at the threshold) before executing any turns. 2. MDA continues to be used only for the LNAV and circling procedures. 3. TCH has been traditionally used in precision approaches as the height of the GS above threshold. With publication of LNAV/VNAV minimums and RNAV descent angles, including graphically depicted descent profiles, TCH also applies to the height of the “descent angle,” or glidepath, at the threshold. Unless otherwise required for larger type aircraft that may be using the IAP, the typical TCH is 30 to 50 feet. The minima format changes slightly: 1. Each line of minima on the RNAV IAP is titled to reflect the RNAV system applicable (e.g., LPV, LNAV/ VNAV, and LNAV). Circling minima is also provided. 2. The minima title box also indicates the nature of the minimum altitude for the IAP. For example: DA is published next to the minima line title for minimums supporting vertical guidance, and MDA is published where the minima line supports only lateral guidance. During an approach where an MDA is used, descent below MDA is not authorized. 3. Where two or more systems share the same minima, each line of minima is displayed separately. For more information concerning government charts, the AeroNav Products can be contacted by telephone or via their internet address at: National Aeronautical Navigation Products (AeroNav Products) Telephone 800-626-3677 www.aeronav.faa.gov